← Saturday, Nov 7, 2026

Evening X digest — Saturday, Nov 7, 2026

Published Saturday, Nov 7, 2026, 4:57 PM ET

X content below is the authors' opinions, unverified.

Stock sentiment from James’s X feed: Saturday, Nov 7, 2026 (evening)

Source: about 67 new public original posts (no retweets, no replies) from 18 of the 26 followed accounts, posted roughly 6:04 AM to 4:42 PM ET Saturday. Quiet today: @poteto, @ArtificialAnlys, @MrTinvests, @thestockwhale, @RoyLMattox, @GavinSBaker, @EMostaque, @ChrisCamillo. Heaviest posters: @TheLongInvest (10), @pequityresearch (9 incl. 1 duplicate), @kimmonismus (7), @Mr_Derivatives (7 incl. 1 duplicate), @KobeissiLetter (6). Every stance, level, and number below is the author’s opinion or claim. None of it has been verified.

Summary

Overall: Mixed, leaning constructive on ‘buy the damage’ after Thursday’s rout, with volatility and capacity-policy risk still the counterweight, in the authors’ telling. Bull side: @ParadisLabs said investors are positioned as if Tech were reporting negative Q3 earnings growth vs about 53% aggregate growth (his figures) and called it “probably a good spot” to start rebuilding longer-term positions; @ren_stocks said tech trades at about 17x forward vs 18x for the S&P, below its 10- and 30-year medians (his figures); @babyfolio said quality AI names are getting dragged down with the sector; @TheProfInvestor said to use the weekend to study which stocks held weekly support. Caution: @Mr_Derivatives said the $VIX had its highest weekly close since the March 23 week, though he also floated a seasonal “VIX crush” starting as soon as next week; @KobeissiLetter said Thursday set a record 11.23M CBOE put contracts (his figures).

For James’s themes: Memory got a defense: @aleabitoreddit quoted industry commentary that $MU strategic customer agreements “cannot be unilaterally canceled,” and both @jukan05 and @aleabitoreddit pushed back on the TSMC-enters-DRAM story (Tom’s Hardware, as he posted, says a TSMC spokesperson denied exploring 3D DRAM). @pequityresearch kept a caveat that LTA terms “look good on paper” but the upcycle is what matters now. Neoclouds: @aleabitoreddit gave a contrarian bull case for $NBIS after the valuation crash; @Mr_Derivatives relayed Citrini saying cover $NBIS and short $IREN; NBIS and CRWV report next week, per @Mr_Derivatives. Power and policy split: @kimmonismus called data-center water and electricity-price blame “myths,” but also said US political resistance is delaying model releases; Goldman via @pequityresearch said states with potential restrictions hold about 45% of planned US capacity (Texas about 25%), and UBS about 30% of added capacity through 2028 could be affected (as posted). AMZN: an expert note via @pequityresearch put AWS incremental AI capacity at 55% Trainium vs 45% NVIDIA GPUs (as posted). Optics: BofA via @pequityresearch said a DSP shortage may cap 1.6T transceiver shipments at 60-70M vs 90-100M demand in 2027 (as posted), relevant to CRDO’s area though CRDO wasn’t named. SpaceX: @ParadisLabs relayed FundaAI’s bull case of about 1 GW of SpaceX compute in space by end-2028. For James’s own context (not from X): Fri 11/6 confirmed weekly exits TSM 375.29 < 390 and ASML 1424.75 < 1500; QQQ 656.18 still < 700 (buys paused). Markets are closed for the weekend.

Most bullish (at least 2 mentions): MU (net +0.67: LTA durability, TSMC-DRAM denial, ren tag), NBIS (+0.6: Serenity contrarian bull, Citrini cover, ren tag, vs neutral earnings and revenue-per-MW notes), SPCX (+1.0), AI capability and usage notes (+0.5), and QQQ/broad tape (+0.29 on valuation and positioning).

Most bearish (at least 2 mentions): Nothing net bearish today. Closest: NVDA mixed (+0.11; the H200 China-buyer NYT story via @NoLimitGains at half weight and the AWS Trainium-share note vs ren and BofA demand tags) and data-center policy only narrowly positive (+0.2; Goldman/UBS restriction estimates and kimmonismus on political resistance vs his own water and power myth-busting posts). On the tape, the VIX weekly close and record put volume were the bearish side.

Changes vs. Nov 7 morning report: Tone moved from defend-the-lines caution to valuation and ‘study the damage’ talk. NBIS swung back from mixed to leaning bullish as Citrini reportedly covered its NBIS short. MU turned clearly bullish on the LTA and TSMC-denial pushback. New: Goldman/UBS capacity-restriction estimates, AWS Trainium share, BofA DSP shortage, VIX weekly-close and record put volume. @TheProfInvestor posted that Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) is in an 85% drawdown while @aleabitoreddit’s own post claims +594.4% YTD; neither is verified. Still no mentions of DDOG, CRWD, ASML, CRDO, AMD, or INTC.

Method: Same as prior reports. Original posts only (no retweets or replies). I matched cashtags and clear company names in every new post, then judged each author’s stance per ticker as bullish, bearish or neutral from the visible text. Net score = (bullish − bearish) ÷ total, from −1 to +1. Promo-heavy accounts (@thestockwhale, @NoLimitGains) count at half weight, near-duplicate posts are dropped (kept the later of each @aleabitoreddit TSM-DRAM, @Mr_Derivatives Citrini, @pequityresearch LTA and @ren_stocks tech-valuation pair), and pure politics, lifestyle, motivational, workshop/podcast promos, and AI-model posts without a market angle are skipped. SPCX is now listed under James’s holdings.

James’s holdings

QQQ / Nasdaq 100 and broad market — holding

7 mentions from 6 accounts · bullish 4 / bearish 2 / neutral 1 · net +0.29 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Leaning bullish on valuation and positioning, with volatility as the bear case. Bull: @ParadisLabs said positioning implies negative Tech Q3 earnings growth vs about 53% actual aggregate growth and called it a spot to start rebuilding longer-term positions; @ren_stocks said tech is at about 17x forward vs 18x for the S&P, below its 10- and 30-year medians; @babyfolio on quality AI names dragged down with the sector; @Mr_Derivatives floated a seasonal VIX crush starting as soon as next week. Bear: @Mr_Derivatives said the VIX had its highest weekly close since the March 23 week; @KobeissiLetter on record put volume Thursday. Neutral: @TheProfInvestor said to study which stocks held major weekly support and refused new lows with the Nasdaq.

Notable posts: - @Mr_Derivatives (bullish, 447 likes): “Very interesting $VIX chart! This year is ALMOST matching the last 20 year VIX seasonality to a tee! Obviously not going to be exact, but this is the closest I ever seen it. If thi…” - @KobeissiLetter (bearish, 341 likes): “Thursday was a historic session in the US options market: US put option trading volume on CBOE surged to a record 11.23 million contracts on Thursday. This surpassed the previous a…” - @TheProfInvestor (neutral, 300 likes): “The market just gave you one of the most useful weekends of the year. Not because you need to predict Monday. Because you finally have damage to study. This weekend, I’d be looking…” - @ParadisLabs (bullish, 226 likes): “Wow. WTF?! Investors are currently positioned as if Tech companies are reporting NEGATIVE earnings growth for Q3! This compares to Q3 growth for Tech of 53% in aggregate and 35% fo…” - @Mr_Derivatives (bearish, 139 likes): “The $VIX just had its highest weekly close since the March 23rd week. If the $VIX closed the month of November today, it would be the highest monthly close since September 2022. An…” - @babyfolio (bullish, 117 likes): “There are so many great opportunities in AI right now, with plenty of quality stocks getting dragged down with the entire sector. Which ones do you think will recover the fastest?” - @ren_stocks (bullish, 68 likes): “$NVDA $NBIS $MU $BE $SNDK $MRVL So you’re telling me tech is trading below the S&P 500…at 17x forward earnings against 18x for the whole index. That’s below its own 10-year and 3…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - @ParadisLabs: Tech Q3 growth about 53% aggregate, 35% median (his figures). - @ren_stocks: tech about 17x forward vs 18x S&P (his figures). - @KobeissiLetter: record 11.23M CBOE put contracts Thursday vs prior 10.22M on Apr 4, 2025 (his figures). - @Mr_Derivatives: VIX highest weekly close since the Mar 23 week (his claim). - James (not X): QQQ after-close 11/6 at 656.18, still below 700, so buys stay paused.

AMZN — holding

2 mentions from 2 accounts · bullish 1 / bearish 0 / neutral 1 · net +0.50 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Constructive on custom silicon. An expert-call note via @pequityresearch said AWS incremental AI capacity is 55% Trainium vs 45% NVIDIA GPUs, and projected 7.3 GW net-add capacity splits about 60/40 Trainium/NVIDIA physically (as posted). @Mr_Derivatives’ YTD list had $AMZN at +14.48% (neutral).

Notable posts: - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 220 likes): “YTD: $AAPL +26.33% $AMZN +14.48% $MSFT +12.19% $NVDA -1.17% $META -6.19% $GOOGL -9.64% $TSLA -18.23% We have not seen this much disparity between the Maggy 7’s since 2018! https://…” - @pequityresearch (bullish, 23 likes): “Expert Takeaways: Amazon AWS > Incremental physical AI capacity stands at 55% AWS Trainium versus 45% NVIDIA GPUs. > Projected net-add AI capacity of 7.3 GW breaks down physically…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Expert note via @pequityresearch: AWS 7.3 GW projected net-add AI capacity, 60% Trainium / 40% NVIDIA physically, about 50/50 capex (as posted). - @Mr_Derivatives: AMZN +14.48% YTD (his figure). - James (not X): AMZN held above 235 on the 11/6 close.

MSFT — holding

2 mentions from 2 accounts · bullish 0 / bearish 0 / neutral 2 · net +0.0 (mixed, authors’ opinions)

No stance posts. @Mr_Derivatives’ YTD list had $MSFT at +12.19%; @kimmonismus posted an interview with Microsoft’s EVP of CoreAI Jay Parikh on Copilot Fusion and AI code review.

Notable posts: - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 220 likes): “YTD: $AAPL +26.33% $AMZN +14.48% $MSFT +12.19% $NVDA -1.17% $META -6.19% $GOOGL -9.64% $TSLA -18.23% We have not seen this much disparity between the Maggy 7’s since 2018! https://…” - @kimmonismus (neutral, 20 likes): “I sat down with Microsoft’s EVP of CoreAI Jay Parikh at @github Universe to discuss Copilot Fusion, AI code review and the future of software development. It is one of the coolest…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - @Mr_Derivatives: MSFT +12.19% YTD (his figure).

GOOG / GOOGL (Alphabet) — holding

1 mentions from 1 accounts · bullish 0 / bearish 0 / neutral 1 · net +0.0 (mixed, authors’ opinions)

One neutral data mention: @Mr_Derivatives’ YTD list had $GOOGL at −9.64%, and he said Mag 7 dispersion is the widest since 2018.

Notable posts: - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 220 likes): “YTD: $AAPL +26.33% $AMZN +14.48% $MSFT +12.19% $NVDA -1.17% $META -6.19% $GOOGL -9.64% $TSLA -18.23% We have not seen this much disparity between the Maggy 7’s since 2018! https://…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - @Mr_Derivatives: GOOGL −9.64% YTD (his figure).

NVDA — holding

5 mentions from 4 accounts · bullish 2 / bearish 1.5 / neutral 1 · net +0.11 (mixed, authors’ opinions)

Mixed. Bull: @ren_stocks tagged $NVDA with the cheap-tech-valuation post; BofA via @pequityresearch on 800G/1.6T demand of 90-100M units each in 2027 tagged $NVDA. Bear: @NoLimitGains (half weight) relayed a New York Times investigation that some of about 24 Chinese companies approved for H200 purchases had empty offices or ties to a blacklisted firm; the AWS expert note via @pequityresearch put NVIDIA at 45% of AWS incremental AI capacity vs 55% Trainium. Neutral: @Mr_Derivatives had $NVDA at −1.17% YTD.

Notable posts: - @NoLimitGains (bearish, 341 likes): “The US government approved Nvidia $NVDA H200 chip sales to about 24 Chinese companies, according to a New York Times investigation. When reporters went to check some of them, the o…” - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 220 likes): “YTD: $AAPL +26.33% $AMZN +14.48% $MSFT +12.19% $NVDA -1.17% $META -6.19% $GOOGL -9.64% $TSLA -18.23% We have not seen this much disparity between the Maggy 7’s since 2018! https://…” - @pequityresearch (bullish, 119 likes): “BofA: The supply chain expects global 800G and 1.6T demand to reach 90-100 million units each in 2027. A DSP shortage means the industry is likely to ship only 60-70 million 1.6T t…” - @ren_stocks (bullish, 68 likes): “$NVDA $NBIS $MU $BE $SNDK $MRVL So you’re telling me tech is trading below the S&P 500…at 17x forward earnings against 18x for the whole index. That’s below its own 10-year and 3…” - @pequityresearch (bearish, 23 likes): “Expert Takeaways: Amazon AWS > Incremental physical AI capacity stands at 55% AWS Trainium versus 45% NVIDIA GPUs. > Projected net-add AI capacity of 7.3 GW breaks down physically…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - @NoLimitGains / NYT (as posted): about 24 Chinese companies approved for H200 sales. - Expert note via @pequityresearch: AWS incremental AI capacity 55% Trainium vs 45% NVIDIA (as posted). - @Mr_Derivatives: NVDA −1.17% YTD (his figure).

AMD — holding

No mentions today.

MU — holding

6 mentions from 4 accounts · bullish 4 / bearish 0 / neutral 2 · net +0.67 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Bullish defense of the memory cycle. @aleabitoreddit quoted industry commentary that $MU strategic customer agreements “cannot be unilaterally canceled” and customers must pay for committed volumes; @jukan05 said TSMC’s memory project isn’t commodity DRAM, so the ‘TSMC disrupts the big three’ claim doesn’t make sense; @aleabitoreddit then relayed Tom’s Hardware that a TSMC spokesperson denied exploring 3D DRAM; @ren_stocks tagged $MU on the valuation post. Neutral: @pequityresearch said LTA conditions “look good on paper” but what matters now is the upcycle, and shared a J.P. Morgan server-memory revenue-mix chart.

Notable posts: - @jukan05 (bullish, 620 likes): “RE: The claim that TSMC will enter memory and disrupt the big three memory makers This doesn’t make sense. As far as I know, TSMC has been working on this project for more than fiv…” - @aleabitoreddit (bullish, 546 likes): “Some industry commentary regarding a few claims recently on memory + Softbank Turbine defaulting. - On claims that LTAs are “meaningless while prices fall”: $MU: “strategic custome…” - @aleabitoreddit (bullish, 331 likes): “A $TSM Spokesperson has reportedly denied exploring 3D DRAM per Tom’s Hardware. After a report yesterday from The Information stated TSMC’s production plans were from $NVDA’s reque…” - @ren_stocks (bullish, 68 likes): “$NVDA $NBIS $MU $BE $SNDK $MRVL So you’re telling me tech is trading below the S&P 500…at 17x forward earnings against 18x for the whole index. That’s below its own 10-year and 3…” - @pequityresearch (neutral, 64 likes): “J.P. Morgan: server compute memory revenue mix comparison across major memory makers $SNDK $MU $SKHY $DRAM $EWY https://t.co/InMgRF0iy6” - @pequityresearch (neutral, 46 likes): “Ok, I have said a lot about the LTAs myself too and I still think Jukan makes some good point worth noting. Of course, right now, none of this matters because the industry remains…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Industry commentary via @aleabitoreddit: MU strategic customer agreements cannot be unilaterally canceled (as posted). - Tom’s Hardware via @aleabitoreddit: TSMC spokesperson denied exploring 3D DRAM (as posted).

TSM — holding

2 mentions from 2 accounts · bullish 0 / bearish 0 / neutral 2 · net +0.0 (mixed, authors’ opinions)

Neutral, news-driven. @aleabitoreddit relayed Tom’s Hardware that a TSMC spokesperson denied exploring 3D DRAM, after The Information reported production plans tied to an NVIDIA request; @jukan05 said TSMC’s 5-year-plus memory project isn’t commodity DRAM.

Notable posts: - @jukan05 (neutral, 620 likes): “RE: The claim that TSMC will enter memory and disrupt the big three memory makers This doesn’t make sense. As far as I know, TSMC has been working on this project for more than fiv…” - @aleabitoreddit (neutral, 331 likes): “A $TSM Spokesperson has reportedly denied exploring 3D DRAM per Tom’s Hardware. After a report yesterday from The Information stated TSMC’s production plans were from $NVDA’s reque…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Tom’s Hardware via @aleabitoreddit: TSMC denies 3D DRAM exploration (as posted). - James (not X): Fri weekly exit CONFIRMED, TSM 375.29 < 390; it also reclaimed the Jul 29 low 372.72.

DDOG — holding

No mentions today.

CRWD — holding

No mentions today.

BE — holding

1 mentions from 1 accounts · bullish 1 / bearish 0 / neutral 0 · net +1.0 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

One bullish tag: @ren_stocks included $BE in the tech-below-S&P-valuation post. Adjacent power theme: @kimmonismus argued national price data don’t support data centers as the blanket cause of rising US power prices (not a BE call).

Notable posts: - @ren_stocks (bullish, 68 likes): “$NVDA $NBIS $MU $BE $SNDK $MRVL So you’re telling me tech is trading below the S&P 500…at 17x forward earnings against 18x for the whole index. That’s below its own 10-year and 3…”

NBIS — holding

5 mentions from 4 accounts · bullish 3 / bearish 0 / neutral 2 · net +0.60 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Leaning bullish into earnings next week. Bull: @aleabitoreddit gave a contrarian take that neoclouds like $NBIS look compelling after the valuation crash, citing SpaceX’s focus on the market; @Mr_Derivatives relayed that Citrini Research says to cover $NBIS now and begin shorting $IREN; @ren_stocks tagged $NBIS on the valuation post. Neutral: @Mr_Derivatives said all eyes are on $CRWV and $NBIS earnings next week; Bernstein via @pequityresearch shared annualized revenue per MW for 2Q26 across $CRWV $NBIS $IREN (chart only).

Notable posts: - @aleabitoreddit (bullish, 1,342 likes): “I’m going to give a contrarian take on Neoclouds like $NBIS and say the theme looks compelling after the valuation crash. Since there’s a reason why Elon’s $SPCX is heavily focused…” - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 510 likes): “Earnings next week. While everyone else is focused on $CRWV $NBIS, I got my eyes set on Grocery Outlet and Noodles & Co. I keed I keed. All 👀’s on the neoclouds… https://t.co/BKUn1…” - @Mr_Derivatives (bullish, 243 likes): “Citrini Research says to cover $NBIS now and begin shorting $IREN. Giving me Citron Research vibes with this much shorting activity lol I mean their names are almost identical. htt…” - @pequityresearch (neutral, 72 likes): “Bernstein: annualized revenue per MW, 2Q26 $CRWV $NBIS $IREN https://t.co/vwgiQaq0Fi” - @ren_stocks (bullish, 68 likes): “$NVDA $NBIS $MU $BE $SNDK $MRVL So you’re telling me tech is trading below the S&P 500…at 17x forward earnings against 18x for the whole index. That’s below its own 10-year and 3…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Citrini via @Mr_Derivatives: cover NBIS, start shorting IREN (as posted). - @Mr_Derivatives: NBIS and CRWV report next week (his post; check IR for the date).

SpaceX / space-based compute — holding

2 mentions from 2 accounts · bullish 2 / bearish 0 / neutral 0 · net +1.0 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Bullish. @ParadisLabs relayed FundaAI’s bull case of about 1 GW of SpaceX compute in space by end-2028 and tagged $SPCX; @aleabitoreddit cited SpaceX’s focus on the neocloud market as a reason the economics look attractive.

Notable posts: - @aleabitoreddit (bullish, 1,342 likes): “I’m going to give a contrarian take on Neoclouds like $NBIS and say the theme looks compelling after the valuation crash. Since there’s a reason why Elon’s $SPCX is heavily focused…” - @ParadisLabs (bullish, 62 likes): “Orbital data centers - coming soon to a galaxy near you! FundaAI’s bull case scenario sees SpaceX having ~1 GW of compute in space by end-2028. Highly recommend reading the full ar…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - FundaAI via @ParadisLabs: about 1 GW of SpaceX space compute by end-2028 in the bull case (as posted).

ASML — holding

No mentions in the new posts.

CRDO — holding

Not named. Adjacent: BofA via @pequityresearch said a DSP shortage may limit 1.6T transceiver shipments to 60-70M units vs 90-100M demand in 2027 (as posted); DSPs are part of CRDO’s market, so this is context, not a CRDO call.

SMH / semis broadly (SOXX, chip sector) — holding

1 mentions from 1 accounts · bullish 1 / bearish 0 / neutral 0 · net +1.0 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Constructive on component demand. BofA via @pequityresearch on the DSP-constrained 1.6T transceiver market; Nomura via @pequityresearch on substrate supply rising from 1.4M to 3.55M units from 2026 to 2028 (as posted, not scored). Memory covered under MU.

Notable posts: - @pequityresearch (bullish, 119 likes): “BofA: The supply chain expects global 800G and 1.6T demand to reach 90-100 million units each in 2027. A DSP shortage means the industry is likely to ship only 60-70 million 1.6T t…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Nomura via @pequityresearch: substrate market $599M to $2.5B, 2026 to 2028 (as posted).

INTC — holding

No mentions today.

Other tickers and names mentioned (by mention count)

Data center buildout, power, and politics

5 mentions from 3 accounts · bullish 3 / bearish 2 / neutral 0 · net +0.20 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Split. Bull: @kimmonismus said the water-drain claim is false (about 19-23B gallons on site in 2024, about 4% of golf-course use, his figures citing Han et al.) and the power-price claim isn’t supported by national data; @ChrisGPT against banning the technology. Bear: Goldman via @pequityresearch said states with potential restrictions hold about 45% of planned US capacity (Texas about 25%) and UBS about 30% of added capacity through 2028 could be affected; @kimmonismus said US political resistance is a significant factor in model-release delays.

Notable posts: - @kimmonismus (bullish, 1,271 likes): “The claim that data centers are a large drain on the nation’s water does not hold up. Its just false. In 2024, large U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 19–23 billion gallons o…” - @kimmonismus (bearish, 448 likes): “What concerns me is that the political landscape in the US is a significant factor in the delays to new model releases. From all sides, I am hearing growing concern, resentment, an…” - @kimmonismus (bullish, 444 likes): “Another Data center myth: rising energy cost. More specifically, the idea that data centers are the main reason electricity prices are rising across the US. The national price data…” - @ChrisGPT (bullish, 327 likes): “We can automate the majority of work in 10 years and instead of figuring out how to give everyone a better life economically, we’re trying to ban the technology out of fear of the…” - @pequityresearch (bearish, 23 likes): “Goldman Sachs says states with potential restrictions account for roughly 45% of planned U.S. capacity, with Texas alone at about 25%. Meanwhile, UBS estimates that about 30% of ad…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - Goldman via @pequityresearch: about 45% of planned US capacity in states with potential restrictions; Texas about 25% (as posted). - UBS via @pequityresearch: about 30% of added capacity through 2028 could be affected (as posted).

Neoclouds (NBIS / IREN / CRWV)

4 mentions from 3 accounts · bullish 2 / bearish 0 / neutral 2 · net +0.50 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Leaning bullish. @aleabitoreddit contrarian bull after the valuation crash; Citrini via @Mr_Derivatives cover NBIS / short IREN (bullish NBIS, bearish IREN); neutral Bernstein revenue-per-MW chart and earnings-week note.

Notable posts: - @aleabitoreddit (bullish, 1,342 likes): “I’m going to give a contrarian take on Neoclouds like $NBIS and say the theme looks compelling after the valuation crash. Since there’s a reason why Elon’s $SPCX is heavily focused…” - @Mr_Derivatives (neutral, 510 likes): “Earnings next week. While everyone else is focused on $CRWV $NBIS, I got my eyes set on Grocery Outlet and Noodles & Co. I keed I keed. All 👀’s on the neoclouds… https://t.co/BKUn1…” - @Mr_Derivatives (bullish, 243 likes): “Citrini Research says to cover $NBIS now and begin shorting $IREN. Giving me Citron Research vibes with this much shorting activity lol I mean their names are almost identical. htt…” - @pequityresearch (neutral, 72 likes): “Bernstein: annualized revenue per MW, 2Q26 $CRWV $NBIS $IREN https://t.co/vwgiQaq0Fi”

AI capability, usage and labs (OpenAI / Anthropic)

4 mentions from 2 accounts · bullish 3 / bearish 1 / neutral 0 · net +0.50 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Mostly bullish usage notes. @kimmonismus said his Codex use is 700M-1.8B tokens per day and the $200 plan no longer suffices; @ChrisGPT said we are a month ahead of AI 2027 and expects GPT 6.2-level intelligence at 1,000 tokens/sec next year (his forecasts). Bear: @kimmonismus on a judge letting Claude Max usage-promise claims proceed.

Notable posts: - @kimmonismus (bearish, 973 likes): “A US judge has allowed claims over Anthropic’s Claude Max usage promises to proceed. Subscribers allege the advertised 5x and 20x multipliers applied per session, while weekly allo…” - @kimmonismus (bullish, 848 likes): “On average, my current usage of Codex amounts to between 700 million and 1.8 billion tokens per day. The $200 subscription plan is no longer sufficient; I’ll likely have to upgrade…” - @ChrisGPT (bullish, 303 likes): “The fact that we are a month ahead of AI 2027, when everyone thought the forecasters were in accurate. https://t.co/d9I1ueSKZa” - @ChrisGPT (bullish, 116 likes): “Next year, we will have GPT 6.2 level intelligence at 1,000 tokens per second. We are also going to see the mass manufacturing of multiple humanoid companies in America. Tesla and…”

Optical transceivers (LITE / COHR / AAOI)

1 mentions from 1 accounts · bullish 1 / bearish 0 / neutral 0 · net +1.0 (bullish, authors’ opinions)

Bullish demand, supply-limited: BofA via @pequityresearch on 90-100M units each of 800G and 1.6T demand in 2027 with a DSP shortage capping 1.6T at 60-70M (as posted).

Notable posts: - @pequityresearch (bullish, 119 likes): “BofA: The supply chain expects global 800G and 1.6T demand to reach 90-100 million units each in 2027. A DSP shortage means the industry is likely to ship only 60-70 million 1.6T t…”

Bitcoin

1 mentions from 1 accounts · bullish 0 / bearish 1 / neutral 0 · net -1.0 (bearish, authors’ opinions)

Bearish warning: @great_martis said a breach below $75k would be “curtains” (his level).

Notable posts: - @great_martis (bearish, 169 likes): “₿ Bitcoin. Bitcoin is sitting precariously close to its event horizon..the point of no return. A breach below $75k would mean curtains for the computer code. Eyes on 75k. https://t…”

Levels and figures cited (as claimed by the authors, not verified): - @great_martis: $75k (his level).